tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-312657592007-11-16T00:19:05.713-08:00The EOFFTV BlogKevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-34264148574933563832007-11-10T00:12:00.000-08:002007-11-16T00:19:05.786-08:00No Laughing Matter!Whatever happened to British television comedy?<br /><br />Once upon a time, you could always count on at least one or two sitcoms and a clutch of sketch shows each week guaranteed to raise a chuckle or two. From the chilly vantage point of Autumn 2007, those days seem a very long way off in the distance. The great British sitcom has all but bitten the dust, replaced by an increasingly desperate string of fourth-raters usually emanating from BBC Three - maybe it's a generational thing, but the likes of the inexplicably popular <span style="font-weight: bold;">Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps</span> [unpleasant 20-somethings shouting loudly at each other for half an hour a week] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gavin &amp; Stacey</span> have both left me cold and sketch shows like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Tittybangbang</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Touch Me, I'm Karen Taylor</span> and the truly awful <span style="font-weight: bold;">Little Miss Jocelyn</span> are often as incomprehensible as they are unfunny. Even the return of two of the giants of British sketch comedy, Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul</span> proved to be agonizingly embarrassing.<br /><br />But it's not all bad news. Amid the hours of dross that pass themselves off as sitcoms these days [yes <span style="font-weight: bold;">Not Going Out</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Green Green Grass</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">After You've Gone</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ideal</span> et al, I <span style="font-style: italic;">am</span> looking at you] there are the occasional gems to be found, chief among them the brilliant <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Mighty Boosh</span> [returning for a third series this very week] and the subject of one our current <a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/peep_show.htm">competitions</a>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Peep Show</span>.<br /><br />A vehicle for David Mitchell and Robert Webb, it takes the same basic ideas as <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Odd Couple</span> and takes them off in unexpected directions. The basic idea is that two twenty-somethings, Mark [Mitchell] and Jeremy [Webb] who met at university are now sharing a flat in Croydon, south London. What makes the show stand out is the way that the various stories are all told from a first person perspective, the camera switching backwards and forwards between the viewpoints of the two main characters as they go about their daily lives.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Peep Show</span> could so easily be dismissed as unnecessarily gimmicky on first viewing which would be doing this marvelously inventive and often incisive show a grave disservice. And far too many people did it seems - Series Four [currently running as a <a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/peep_show.htm">competition prize</a> over at the main EOFFTV site] almost didn't happen at all when bosses at broadcasters Channel Four were unsure of commissioning a fourth batch of episodes due to consistently low viewing figures. Thankfully, they opted to go for it and Season Four proved to be a much stronger set of episodes than those in the rather tired-looking Series Three.<br /><br />The themes of loneliness and alienation that ran through the first couple of years of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Peep Show</span> have here been replaced by the fear of being trapped in a relationship that is patently doomed from the very start. The series kicks off in high style with the wonderful <span style="font-style: italic;">Sophie's Parents</span>, in which Mark reacts to a weekend at the country estate of his new girlfriend's parents in the only way he know how while Jeremy adds to the chaos by sleeping with Sophie's mum. From there on, Series Four charts Marks increasingly horrible realization that he's heading for a marriage to someone he actually hates.<br /><br />Series Four ends with closure of a sort which makes it odd and perhaps regrettable that a Series Five has already been commissioned - great news that we're going to get to see more of Mark and Jeremy but worrying that it might undo the sense of an ending that Series Four provided.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Peep Show</span> has been running on Channel Four since 2003 and demonstrates that the once daring and innovative channel [celebrating its 25th anniversary this year] hasn't entirely succumbed to tedious reality shows and endlessly recycled American imports. Other recent Four winners have included the brilliant <span style="font-weight: bold;">Black Books</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Garth Marenghi's Darkplace</span>. Blessed with spot-on performances from Mitchell and Webb [so much funnier here than in their hit-or-mostly-miss sketch show <span style="font-weight: bold;">That Mitchell and Webb Look</span>] and genuinely witty, always insightful and even sometimes coruscating scripts from Jesse Armstrong and Sam Bain, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Peep Show</span> suggests that there is hope for small screen British comedy, that it's not all going to be talentless people shouting at each other in silly voices or lame retreads of already well-worn sitcom ideas.<br />KEVIN LYONSKevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-50504774726358832212007-09-25T20:42:00.000-07:002007-10-12T06:33:37.566-07:00Men on the Run<a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/northern_exposure_complete.htm"><img src="http://www.eofftv.com/images/banners/northern_exposure.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="600" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="160" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span> (1963 - 1967), as well as being a very fine thriller series in its own right, exerted an extraordinary influence over small screen science fiction in the 1970s, so much so that at one point one might legitimately have questioned if the studio heads actually realized that other formats may have existed at all.<br /><br />For those unaware - and there must surely be a few - <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span> featured David Janssen as Dr Richard Kimble, wrongly accused of the murder of his wife, who goes on the run from the law while tracking down the mysterious "one-armed man" who really committed the crime. Created by Roy Huggins and produced by the legendary Quinn Martin, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span> ran for four seasons, was turned into a movie in 1993 and had a short-lived (one season of 22 episodes) remake in 2000.<br /><br />The appeal of the format was simple and obvious - it took the chief strength of an ongoing drama series (a recurring character that the audience could come to know and care about) and the flexibility of the anthology shows (a different supporting cast and location each week) and combined them into a durable format that TV execs clearly found impossible to resist.<br /><br />I was reminded just how impossible while watching episodes from the second season of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Incredible Hulk </span>(1978 - 1982) (available in the UK now from Universal Playback). Kenneth Johnson's superhero adaptation remains one of the best remembered genre takes on The Fugitive - it replaces Richard Kimble with David Banner (the original comic character's name Bruce was replaced, allegedly because the producers thought it sounded too 'gay'!) and Lou Ferrigno as the monstrous Hulk, but in all respects it was exactly the same format: an innocent man goes on the run, drifting from one town to the next changing the lives of those he meets along the way.<br /><br />The second series of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Incredible Hulk</span> kicks off with a two-parter which seems to mark an end to Banner's wandering ways - Married finds him seeking help from experimental hypnotherapist Dr Carolyn Fields [70s US TV staple Mariette Hartley] and marrying her in Hawaii. But the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fugitive</span> effect was so great that any chance of happiness was dashed from the off - Fields is suffering a terminal illness and the end is predictable but still rather moving.<br /><br />Banner is soon back on the road and as ever tenacious journalist Jack McGee [Jack Colvin] is on his trail, just as equally tenacious cop Lt Philip Gerard [Barry Morse] tracked his quarry in <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span>. The rest of Season Two finds Banner and his green-skinned alter ego turning up as a mechanic at a racetrack [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Ricky</span>], a barman at a disco [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Alice in Disco Land</span> - this was 1978 and flares and mirrorballs were all the rage] and even crossed the border to Mexico [<span style="font-weight: bold;">A Solitary Place</span>]. Surprisingly, the writers managed to come up with plenty of interesting variations on the well worn theme throughout the year - Banner gets involved with the Black Panthers [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Like a Brother</span>], escapes from a chain gang [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Escape From Los Santos</span>] and even investigates the possibility that a Hulk-like creature existed in prehistoric times [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Kindred Spirits</span>].<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Incredible Hulk</span> was successful enough to run for 5 years and, almost by default, was the best of the rash of small screen superhero adaptations from the late 70s - <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Amazing Spider-Man</span> [1978-1979] was anything but amazing, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Wonder Woman</span> [1976 - 1970] was more successful but relied on camp to the dismay of hardcore fans and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Captain America</span> [1979], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Captain America II Death Too Soon</span> [1979] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Dr Strange</span> [1978] remained one-off made to TV movies with not even a hint of a series in sight. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Incredible Hulk</span> was far from perfect - stories concentrated far too much on Banner and not enough on the Hulk himself and tended to stray far too easily into soap territory - but it proved beyond doubt that the innocent-man-on-the-run format was just about irresistible.<br /><br />It wasn't the first genre TV show to give <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span> a science fiction twist - in 1967, just as <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span>'s Richard Kimble was coming to the end of his run, the baton was picked up by David Vincent [Roy Thinnes] who went on the lam after witnessing the beginning of a covert alien invasion in <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Invaders </span>[1967-1968]. Owing as much to <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Invasion of the Body Snatchers</span> [1956] as to <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Invaders</span> is fondly remembered as the one where the aliens are smart enough to mount a secret invasion but could never get the hang of those pesky little fingers.<br /><br />Later, science fiction <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fugitive</span> clones were everywhere - in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Planet of the Apes</span> [1974], two astronauts are pursued by intelligent gorillas on a future Earth while another big screen spin-off, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Logan's Run</span> [1977] upped the ante and gave us three fugitives on the run from a society that systematically kills its residents at the age of 30. In 1981's <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Phoenix</span>, the alien Bennu of the Golden Light [Judson Earney Scott] is the man on the run after he's released from a casket discovered in ancient Incan ruins while in 1985's <span style="font-weight: bold;">Otherworld</span> a whole family does the Richard Kimble thing, struggling to stay ahead of state bounty hunters in an alternate dimension. Outside the genre, the most successful Fugitive variant was <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kung Fu</span> [1972 - 1975] in which David Carradine roamed the Old West dispensing slow-motion justice while hunted by more of those bounty hunters.<br /><br />The format has proved durable enough to survive into the new millennium - in the much-loved <span style="font-weight: bold;">Farscape </span>[1999 - 2003], John Crichton [Ben Browder] is a combination Richard Kimble and Buck Rogers, a 20th century astronaut hurled into the future where he teams up with a whole spaceship full of fugitives; and in the less well known animation <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Zeta Project</span> [2001-2003], a robot goes walkabout after rebelling against its creator.<br /><br />But of all these <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fugitive</span> departures, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Incredible Hulk</span> remains one of the most fondly remembered - at the time, it was a huge hit in the playgrounds [go on admit it, you tried to rip your shirt like Lou Ferrigno - and how many times did you use the series' famous catchphrase "Don't make me angry - you wouldn't like me when I'm angry"?] and today it looks slow and a bit quaint but the strength of the format is such that you can still find yourself drawn into the plight of poor David Banner.<br /><br />Season Two of The Incredible Hulk is out now from <a href="http://www.universal-playback.com/">Universal Playback</a> - order your copy from <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FIncredible-Hulk-Series-2-Complete%2Fdp%2FB000P29ATK%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1190788703%26sr%3D8-1&amp;tag=e0a-21&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=6738%22%3Ehere%3C/a%3E%3Cimg%20src=%22http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=e0a-21&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=2%22%20width=%221%22%20height=%221%22%20border=%220%22%20alt=%22%22%20style=%22border:none%20%21important;%20margin:0px%20%21important;">Amazon UK here</a>.Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-41404400661891936552007-08-06T11:37:00.000-07:002007-08-06T11:55:19.945-07:00Battlestar vs BattlestarThe curious thing about remakes and "re-imaginings" [surely the most obnoxious term to come out of Hollywood in the last few years] is that for reasons that may never be fully understood by we mortals, the Hollywood suits choose to remake films and TV shows that were great to begin with and didn't need another version. The <span style="font-weight: bold;">Texas Chain Saw Massacre</span> [1974], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Black Christmas</span> [1974], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Halloween</span> [1978], <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Twilight Zone</span> [1959-1964], <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Outer Limits</span> [1963-1965] - they were all fantastic to begin with. Did we really need someone to come along and make an inferior copy?<br /><br />Surely it would make more sense to revisit a production that showed some promise but which, for whatever reason, ended up never quite achieving its potential? That's exactly what happened with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar Galactica</span> and look what a fine job the remake team made of that.<br /><br />The original <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span>, broadcast on ABC between September 1978 and April 1979, was one of the earliest and most high profile examples of the effect that <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Wars</span> [1977] was having on popular culture in the late 1970s. Lucas' space fantasy blockbuster revolutionised the way that film and TV producers thought about science fiction - prior to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Wars</span>, 70s American science fiction cinema produced the likes of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Colossus - The Fobin Project</span> [1970], <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Andromeda Strai</span>n [1971], <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Omega Man</span> [1971], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Dark Star</span> [1974], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Phase IV</span> [1974] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">A Boy and His Dog</span> [1975]; even less successful efforts like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Silent Running</span> [1972] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Logan's Run</span> [1976] at least made an effort to appear intelligent and look like they'd been made for grown up audiences. Post <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Wars</span>, juvenile space opera was largely the order of the day [the likes of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Alien</span> [1979] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Blade Runner</span> [1982] notwithstanding], with the likes of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Black Hole </span>[1979], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battle Beyond the Stars</span> [1980] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Flash Gordon</span> [1980] dictating the way that science fiction was perceived by the general public.<br /><br />Television got in early - Glen A. Larson was a veteran TV writer with credits that included episodes for <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fugitive</span> [1963-1967], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twelve O'Clock High</span> [1964-1967] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">It Takes a Thief</span> [1968-1970] before turning producer in 1971 with the hugely successful comedy western <span style="font-weight: bold;">Alias Smith and Jones</span> [1971 - 1973]. Always a shrewd operator, he was quick off the mark and was the first TV producer to notice the seismic effect that <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Wars</span> was having at the box office. Cannily deciding that this was the start of something big, he pitched his idea for a small screen equivalent and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar Galactica</span> was born - though Larson long maintained that the series was actually conceived as long ago as the late 60s when it was known as <span style="font-weight: bold;">Adam's Ark</span>.<br /><br />Larson originally saw <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span> as a series of expensive one-off TV movies and indeed what eventually became the pilot film was deemed good enough to get a theatrical release outside the States and reached big screens in its homeland after the series had begun broadcasting. It ran into controversy the minute the first footage was seen, when Twentieth Century Fox, who had bankrolled <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Wars</span>, sued Universal [the studio who had picked up the tab for the very costly <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span>] claiming that it infringed on its copyrights in no less than 34 distinct ways.<br /><br />But Universal, Larson and ABC weathered the storm [Universal counter-sued, claiming that <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Wars</span> had lifted much from its <span style="font-weight: bold;">Flash Gordon</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Buck Rogers</span> serials from the 30s as well as more recent product like the aforementioned <span style="font-weight: bold;">Silent Running</span>] and the series went on to enjoy some success before declining audiences and rising costs put paid to the show in 1979. The two-part story <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Living Legends</span> was stitched together to form the 1978 TV movie <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mission Galactica The Cylon Attack</span> which was released to cinemas in Europe and Japan and a dreadful revival series, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Galactica 1980</span> limped through 10 episodes before it and we were put out of our miseries - a further cut and shunt job was created out of several episodes and barely bothered box offices around the world under the title <span style="font-weight: bold;">Conquest of the Earth</span>.<br /><br />The original incarnation was very far from perfect - like so much small screen television, it looked cheap away from its excellent effects sequences [most of which were repeated so often throughout the episodes that they ended up feeling like old friends] and insisted that all alien races should wear silly diaphanous gowns, ridiculous uniforms and strange hairstyles. The scripts became increasingly juvenile as it wore on [and they were hardly mature to begin with] and prolonged exposure only highlighted just how slight and uninteresting the characters really were.<br /><br />However, what <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span> had - and one suspects that this is why it remains so popular today - was a mythology, a complex and fairly consistent back story that few American genre TV shows had tried up until that time. Even <span style="font-weight: bold;">Star Trek</span> [1966-1969] didn't quite manage the epic feeling of the story that underpinned <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span> which ironically bore resemblance to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trek</span> creator Gene Rodenberry's desire to create a "<span style="font-weight: bold;">Wagon Train</span> to the stars" than <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trek</span> ever did. Drawing heavily from Greek, Roman and Biblical mythologies, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span> had a fantastic base on which to build but the episodes that followed the pilot became increasingly formulaic and banal and failed to realise that potential.<br /><br />When the show was "re-magined" [ugh…] in 2003, it kept much of the epic sweep of the original show but gave the show a harder edge, one informed less by classical mythology than by the events of 11 September 2001 and its fall out. Both shows used the same basic, intriguing premise - the last surviving ships of the Twelve Colonies following a devastating war with the robotic Cylons, flee in a vulnerable convoy searching for the almost mythical lost colony known as Earth.<br /><br />But the post-Millennial <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar</span> departed from its parent show in many other ways and its these changes that makes the remake, for some of us at least, so much better than the original. The crew of the original Galactica were meant to be "the best of the best" but, the new crew are a flawed and very human group who are simply doing the best they can and barely scraping through; the characters are far more appealing and far more identifiable than the unconvincing stock "sci fi" characters that populated the first incarnation; and the Cylons are no longer an alien race [there are apparently no alien races in the universe explored by the new Galactica crew] but human technology that has rebelled and is now bent on slaughtering its creators.<br /><br />Perhaps the remake's Cylons are its greatest disappointment. Those huge, clunky machines from the original are something of a genre design classic and while I have no argument or issue of any kind with Tricia Helfer as Number Six, the new Cyclons themselves seem a bit… well, just wrong really. Not quite as iconic. Which may explain why the producers decided to go with the notion of the humanoid Cylons, twelve different models that resemble humans so closely that it's impossible to detect them. The notion that these humanoid Cylons [an idea first used, briefly, in an episode of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Galactica 1980</span>] have infiltrated the Galactica and that the identity of five of them remained unknown even to the Cylons themselves until the climax of Season Three, forms the greater part of the ongoing storyline in the remake.<br /><br />Which version of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar Galactica</span> you're going to enjoy the most is largely going to depend on your taste in science fiction - if you go for flamboyant, action-oriented space opera then the original is pretty well unbeatable. If you want darker, more character-driven drama then it's the remake all the way. Neither incarnation is entirely flawless but both have much to enjoy, from the grandiose sweep of the original's mythology to the gritty machinations of the remake.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Battlestar Galactica</span> is the way all remakes should work - take an original that had a serviceable idea but wasn't as well executed as it could have been and do something fresh with it. Not taking something was great to begin with and screwing it up. Not that anyone in Hollywood is likely to be listening…<br />KEVIN LYONSKevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-36892268441474683392007-06-25T14:01:00.000-07:002007-10-12T06:32:17.535-07:00Nightmare Neighbourhoods<a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/northern_exposure_complete.htm"><img src="http://www.eofftv.com/images/banners/northern_exposure.jpg" width="160" height="600" border="0" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a><br />Small American towns have longed played an important role in science fiction and horror film and television - where would most of Jack Arnold's films be without them - but in the 1990s, American television transformed these sleepy little hamlets into something altogether more sinister. Kicking off with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>[1990 - 1991], there was a bit of a fad for 'Small Town Weirdness' that continued throughout the decade and which occasionally pops up even now.<br /><br />There had been precedents of course - American television had already dallied with the notion that beneath the homely veneer of picket fences and all-American values lay something much nastier, more rancid and unwholesome. Satanic cults seemed to have set up shop in small towns all over the States in early 70s TV [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Black Noon </span>[1971], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Journey to the Unknown: The New People</span> [1969], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ghost Story: Legion of Demons</span> [1973]] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Invasion of the Body Snatchers</span> [1956] - itself a classic of small town paranoia - has proved to be the template for many shows and TV movies, among them Jerry Sohl's <span style="font-weight: bold;">Night Slaves</span> [1970].<br /><br />But it was <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span> that really got city folk in a paranoid panic about those strange sorts living out in the country as surreal supernatural shenanigans replaced the hooded Satanists and alien doppelgangers. Lynch had already explored small town nastiness in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Blue Velvet</span> [1986] and one can only imagine the pitch meeting between Lynch and the suits at ABC as he tried to sell them on the idea of a surreal soap opera murder mystery about demonic visitors from a parallel dimension being investigated by a psychic FBI agent. Presumably he didn't mention the dancing dwarf who spoke backwards...<br /><br />ABC were clearly not sure about what they were getting and instructed Lynch, his co-creator Mark Frost and production company Spelling Entertainment to shoot an alternate ending for the pilot that would wrap up the story in the event that they chose not to commission a full series, allowing them to sell it on as a film. The 'film' version was released on video in Europe and the pilot was sufficiently enticing to calm ABC's nerves. They were rewarded with a massive hit as the first series of 8 episodes - ostensibly about the hunt for the killer of Homecoming Queen Laura Palmer - became the most talked-about show of the year. An even weirder second season followed but the increasingly odd storylines [which culminated in a possessed Dale Cooper trapped inside the otherworldly Black Lodge] and dead-end subplots involving minor characters [brought to the fore when a major plot involving Cooper's love affair with high school girl Audrey Horne was scrapped] led to declining ratings and the show ended after 30 episodes, with the much under-rated feature film <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me</span> [1992] filling in the back story of Laura Palmer in the days leading up to her death.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span> may have been dead but its influence lived on. Though nothing that followed went to quite the extremes that <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span> did [particularly that nightmarish, Lynch-directed final episode, still as unsettling today as when it was first broadcast on 10 June 1991], there were many shows that picked up some of the weirdness of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span> and twisted it in different directions.<br /><br />First out of the gate came <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure</span> [1990 - 1995], its first episode airing just three months after Twin Peaks debuted. Joshua Brand and John Falsey's creation was a much gentler affair than Lynch and Frosts but was no less odd. Rob Morrow starred as Dr Joel Fleischman, a young New York doctor who finds himself forced to relocate to the eccentric Alaskan town of Cicely to pay off his student debts.<br /><br />Brand and Falsey were both members of the Esalen Institute in California, which promoted a humanistic alternative to mainstream education, drawing heavily on Eastern philosophies and the writings of Aldous Huxley, Carl Jung and B.F. Skinner who was an early leader at the institute. Many of the teachings of Esalen found their way into the scripts for <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure </span>which also drew on the 'magical realism' of authors like Italo Calvino, Carlos Fuentes, Gabriel García Márquez et al and the show frequently diverted into strange fantasy and dreams. It even spoofed <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>in the 9 August 1990 episode, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Russian Flu </span>which sent-up the music and look of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Peaks </span>and made mention of the enigmatic Log Lady as well as explicitly referencing the coffee and cherry pie that most of the inhabitants of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span> seemed obsessed with.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure</span> was a outré than <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span>, less concerned with surreal horror and much happier to play with surreal light comedy, and the characters were generally more likeable. This may explain why it outlived <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span>, running to six excellent seasons packed full of intelligently written essays on the eccentricities of life in a remote, cut-off community.<br /><br />During the early run of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure</span>, producer Joshua Brand was involved in a similar series, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Going to Extremes</span>, which sent a group of American medical students to a Caribbean island and again meeting an odd assortment of characters. It proved to be just a bit to much like going over old ground and the show lasted a single season.<br /><br />Director Joe Dante was just one of the talents involved with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eerie, Indiana</span> [1991 - 1992] a short lived but brilliant comedy that saw young Marshall Teller and his family relocate from New Jersey to the eponymous town which turns out to be "the centre of weirdness for the universe." Among the inhabitants are Elvis Presley, twins who retain their youth by sleeping in Tupperware, a pack of dogs conspiring to take over the world, Mr Chaney the werewolf and many other often borderline-dangerous eccentrics.<br /><br />Although <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eerie, Indiana </span>mostly played it for laughs, it had a more direct line of descent from <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>than <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure </span>- it was weirder for a start and despite the jokier tone and feeling that the show was being pitched at a much younger audience, there was still a palpable sense of unease running through the show. The terrors were mostly those that would trouble the under tens [a lot of the creepiness centres around the local school and adults are certainly not to be trusted] but the humour and unpredictability of the scripts proved enough incentive for adults to stay with the show during its criminally short run. It even got decidedly post-modern when, in the episode <span style="font-weight: bold;">Reality Takes a Holiday</span>, Marshall [played by Omri Katz] finds a script for a TV show in his mailbox. Suddenly he's in a television studio, playing a character called Marshall, and everyone thinks his name is Omri...<br /><br />As alluded to above, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eerie, Indiana </span>is similar to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>in one main respect - it didn't last very long. A single season of just 19 episodes in fact - a twentieth, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Jolly Rogers</span>, was written by Will A. Akers but was never filmed. It was something of a hallmark of these 'Nightmare Neighbourhood' shows with only <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure </span>managing to stay the course. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eerie, Indiana </span>was sort-of revived in 1998 with the equally short-lived [it too lasted only a season] <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eerie, Indiana: The Other Dimension</span>, shot in Canada and starring none of the original cast.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>[1992 - 1996] was the brainchild of David E. Kelly, later to bring us more small screen weirdness in the shape of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ally McBeal </span>[1997 - 2002]. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>was set in the seemingly idyllic small town [aren't they all?] of Rome, Wisconsin where the cows give birth to human babies, mayors invariably meet sticky ends, a serial bather is on the loose, breaking into residents homes and leaving unsightly soap rings in their baths, and Sheriff Jimmy Brock [Tom Skeritt] struggles to make sense of it all.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>differentiated itself from other <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>derived dramas by pretending to be a crime drama - every week, some sort of misdemeanour would be committed and Sheriff Brock would dutifully investigate, but invariably the crimes were never quite the sort of things other small screen cops would be expected to deal with. Violent shoot-outs with crazed drug lords? Organised crime on your tail? Bent cops giving you grief? That's nothing compared to the catalogue of bizarre cases investigated by Brock and his deputies, the gung-ho Maxine and former big-city cop Kenny. Murder by steamroller, a Tin Man murdered on stage during an amateur performance of <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wizard of Oz</span>, a mercy-killing nun, a possible UFO abduction and the messy fates of that seemingly never-ending string of mayors were all in a days work for the Rome PD.<br /><br />Much more in the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure </span>vein than of eccentricity rather than the dark surrealism of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>wasn't afraid to tackle 'big' issues [foetal tissue transplantation, the Holocaust and AIDS were just some of the issues it turned its hand to] and as you'd expect from a writer of Kelley's calibre the scripts were intelligent, witty and crammed full of characters that are not easily forgotten. Indeed for some of us, this remains his best work.<br /><br />Kelley managed to work in a couple of crossover with another of his shows, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Chicago Hope</span> [1994 - 2000] - in the 1994 <span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>episode <span style="font-weight: bold;">Rebels With Causes</span>, two of the residents of Rome travel to Chicago Hope Hospital, while in the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Chicago Hope </span>episode <span style="font-weight: bold;">Small Sacrifices </span>[1995], one of the Rome residents again seeks medical assistance at the hospital.<br /><br />More intriguingly, Kelley pulled off a sort-off crossover with <span style="font-weight: bold;">The X Files </span>[1993 - 2002], another show that benefited from the space opened up by <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>and which itself featured a number of creepy small towns [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Red Museum </span>[1994], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Die Hand die Verletzt </span>[1995], <span style="font-weight: bold;">War of the Coprophages </span>[1996], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Home </span>[1996], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Bad Blood </span>[1998] et al]. Kelley and <span style="font-weight: bold;">X Files </span>supreme Chris Carter had discussed the idea of a full-on crossover but as the shows were on rival networks, it simply wasn't going to happen. Instead, they managed to sneak a much more subtle crossover under the noses of the suits - the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>episode <span style="font-weight: bold;">Away In a Manger </span>involves strange goings-on involving the local cows, and one character specifically mentions that something similar had happened recently in the nearby town of Delta Glen. It's absolutely no coincidence whatsoever that the <span style="font-weight: bold;">X Files </span>story <span style="font-weight: bold;">Red Museum </span>was set in the fictional Wisconsin town of Delta Glen and also featured odd happenings with cows. The <span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences</span> episode even namedrops the very same Dr Larsen who appeared in <span style="font-weight: bold;">The X Files </span>- and amazingly no-one at CBS, home of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Picket Fences </span>and the network most against the crossover, noticed!<br /><br />Sticking much closer to the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>formula was the wonderful <span style="font-weight: bold;">American Gothic </span>[1995 - 1996], another criminally short-lived show, this one created by Shaun Cassidy and exec produced by Sam Raimi. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Evil Dead </span>director was busy on the small screen for some while from the mid-1990s [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Hercules The Legendary Journeys </span>[1995 - 1999], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Young Hercules </span>[1998 - 1999], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Xena Warrior Princess </span>[1995 - 2001], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Cleopatra 2525 </span>[2000 - 2001]] but <span style="font-weight: bold;">American Gothic </span>was by far and away the best TV show to bear his name.<br /><br />Gary Cole, hitherto best known for his role of late-night radio presenter Jack Killian in the excellent <span style="font-weight: bold;">Midnight Caller </span>[1988 - 1991] turns in a terrific and terrifying turn as Sheriff Lucas Buck, the corrupt and possibly demonic lawman of Trinity, South Carolina who starts to pursue his estranged young son Caleb as the town's twisted network of sometimes unfathomable relationships starts to unravel. Caleb is watched over by his dead sister Merlyn [whose repeated cry of "there's someone at the door!" remains the show's most chilling memory] but even her motivations are called into question in a show where the line between Good and Evil is extremely hazy.<br /><br />Blessed with an excellent cast [which also included Paige Turco, Brenda Bakke, Sarah Paulson and, in the episode <span style="font-weight: bold;">Meet the Beetles</span>, Bruce Campbell], directors who knew how to work up and sustain an atmosphere of dread and unease [among them TV veterans James Frawley, Bruce Seth Green and Mel Damski] and clever, sharp scripts [from the likes of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Miracle Mile</span>'s [1988] Steve De Jarnatt and Stephen Gaghan, future Oscar winner for <span style="font-weight: bold;">Traffic </span>[2000]], <span style="font-weight: bold;">American Gothic </span>should have been the one that broke the Nightmare Neighbourhoods duck and joined <span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Exposure </span>in a long lifespan. Sadly it wasn't to be - network CBS seemed to have no idea what they'd been given by Cassidy and Raimi and constantly moved it around the schedules, pre-empted new episodes and finally pulled the plug with four episodes still unshown.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">American Gothic </span>deserved a better hand than the one it was dealt - today it's still creepy as hell, it's multi-layered scripts ensuring that it remains repeatedly watchable over a decade later. The characters are the best drawn of any of the post-<span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>shows and the eternal story of Good vs Evil is given enough new wrinkles to ensure <span style="font-weight: bold;">American Gothic </span>a devoted cult following who are still prepared to fly the flag for a show that deserved so much more from a network who simply didn't seem to understand what it was trying to do.<br /><br />Shaun Cassidy - a former musician, half-brother of pop star David Cassidy - returned to small town America in 2005 for <span style="font-weight: bold;">Invasion </span>which saw a small community under threat from aliens who infiltrate the town in the wake of a hurricane.<br /><br />The thread of American 'Small Town Weirdness' shows largely petered out after <span style="font-weight: bold;">American Gothic</span>, though their influence can still be detected today - the bizarre <span style="font-weight: bold;">Carnivalé </span>[2003 - ], though set mostly in a travelling circus, has some of the same sense of all not being well beneath the smiley veneer of small town America and the Sci-Fi Channel's recent <span style="font-weight: bold;">Eureka </span>[2006 - ongoing] [<span style="font-weight: bold;">A Town Called Eureka </span>in the UK] revived the formula to great success. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jericho </span>[2006 - 2007], although much more concerned with post-9/11 fears of terrorism, also had some of that 'Small Town Weirdness' about it.<br /><br />Even British television got in on the act, though given that it's a smaller country and towns tend to be less remote than some of those in the States. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Springhill </span>[1996 - 1997] was a 26 episode / two series show shown on satellite/cable channel Sky One. Set not in a remote town but a suburb of Liverpool, it featured the Freeman family whose already complicated lives [here of their five children were actually mothered by Eva Morrigan with who Jack Freeman had once had an affair] were made even more convoluted when Eva returns and seems to be a witch and angels seem be watching over the family as a full scale war between Good and Evil threatens to tear the family apart.<br /><br />Much later, the ITV soap opera <span style="font-weight: bold;">Night and Day </span>[2001 - 2003] transplanted the basic premise of Twin Peaks [the tragedy of a young resident, in this case 16 year old Jane Harper who vanishes without trace, and its devastating effects on a community] to Greenwich in south east London. It featured a mysterious stranger who could stop time and, in the last episode, a ghost and drew heavily on the "guilty-secrets-uncovered-by-tragedy" theme that had run through <span style="font-weight: bold;">Twin Peaks </span>but the inner city setting worked against it and it simply wasn't as creepy, effective or memorable as Lynch and Frost's original.<br />KEVIN LYONS<br /><br />Thanks to Tise Vahimagi for his ideas and help - and for the title!<br /><br />To win a copy of Season Six of Northern Exposure, visit our competitions page <a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/northern_exposure_6.htm">here</a>.Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-55892232359818274642007-03-13T19:56:00.000-07:002007-03-15T12:56:05.671-07:00Down Dark Alleys and Through Darker Minds...<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_BMSgGPZPd-I/Rfmkvb8OuFI/AAAAAAAAAAM/hL6O6OEPr58/s1600-h/film_noir.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_BMSgGPZPd-I/Rfmkvb8OuFI/AAAAAAAAAAM/hL6O6OEPr58/s320/film_noir.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5042242392679168082" border="0" /></a>What, I hear you ask, is EOFFTV doing giving away a film noir box Set? What does this hard-boiled crime genre have to do with the sort of films we cover here? More than you might think...<br /><br />Film noir and the horror film in particular have much in common - not only did they share many of the same writers and directors [Edgar G. Ulmer, Fritz Lang, Irving Pichel et al] but also shared many of the same concerns. Both genres hold a mirror up to the society in which they were made and reflects back some of the more unhealthy and unpalatable truths that society would rather remained repressed. Both are far better equipped to deal with the seamier and more confrontational side of modern society than any other genre which probably goes some way to explaining the longevity of their popularity - despite claims to the contrary, noir still gets made though its tropes and techniques have generally been subsumed into other genres.<br /><br />Film noir is often discussed as though it were a genre in itself and has become a useful - if often mis-used - label to hang on a certain type of film. But it's probably more useful to consider noir as a collection of themes, techniques and styles that have proven themselves remarkably adaptable, able to be applied to films of other genres to give them that unmistakable noir feel. We've can science fiction noir [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Alphaville</span> [1965], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Soylent Green</span> [1973] and most notably <span style="font-weight: bold;">Blade Runner</span> [1982]] and the whole cyberpunk movement channelled the greats of literary noir into a whole new form of science fiction literature; animation noir [watch either of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ghost in the Shell</span> films and you'll see many of the noir tropes in anime form]; even, arguably, film noir westerns [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Lust For Gold </span>[1949], <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Return of Jesse James </span>[1950], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Dead Man </span>[1995]].<br /><br />Quite often, the most interesting films are those born when genres collide and the fusion of horror and film noir in particular has spawned some truly impressive and unique films. The cross-pollination of the two genres began early - in 1943, Reginald LeBorg directed Lon Chaney Jr in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Calling Dr Death</span> which displayed many of the iconic techniques associated with noir and many of the low budget 40s offerings from Poverty Row specialists PRC employed the same style PRC of course made one of the seminal 40s noirs, Edgar G. Ulmer's wonderful <span style="font-weight: bold;">Detour</span> [1945]].<br /><br />The first truly great horror film to make use of noir's signature look, feel and attitude was Charles Laughton's still extraordinary <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Night of the Hunter</span> [1955] which drew heavily on German Expressionism, another of the factors that unites horror and noir - both genres have solid roots in the form and drew many of their early practitioners from adherents of Expressionism.<br /><br />Curiously, more horror films have made use of noir in the years since the form's heyday - the TV movie <span style="font-weight: bold;">Cast a Deadly Spell</span> [1991] is a deliberate pastiche of film noir in a horror setting; <span style="font-weight: bold;">Lord of Illusions</span> [1995], based on the Clive Barker novel, and Alan Parker's extraordinary <span style="font-weight: bold;">Angel Heart</span> [1987] both mix the hard-boiled detective genre with noir styles and horror themes; even higher profile, more mainstream horrors got in on the act - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Fatal Attraction</span> [1987], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Se7en</span> [1995] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Silence of the Lambs</span> [1991] all called on the noir tradition to varying degrees. And on the small screen, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The X Files</span> [1993 - 2002] directors were clearly well versed in the history of film noir.<br /><br />So horror and film noir are no strangers to one another and anyone interested in horror should do at least a superficial delve into the murky, sordid world of noir. The box set we're giving away at the moment contains four of the best, particularly Billy Wilder's classic <span style="font-weight: bold;">Double Indemnity</span> [1944] which would be as good a place as any to start of you haven't tried noir yet. Convinced? Then why not enter our Film Noir competition <a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/classic_cuts_competition.htm">here</a> - and if you can't wait, the Classic Cuts: Film Noir collection is available to buy from 26 March 2007.<br />KEVIN LYONSKevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-8525164258858976372007-03-12T12:21:00.000-07:002007-03-12T12:23:37.050-07:00Hitchcock's Hidden Secret?If there's one director who's already had more than enough written about him and his films, it's probably Alfred Hitchcock. But re-watching old tapes of the classic Alfred Hitchcock Presents TV show in advance of their Region 2 DVD release, I found myself, as I often do, wandering again about the man behind some of the most iconic of all cinematic images. Again, much has been written about what Hitchcock's films and TV work revealed about the man himself, most notably Donald Spoto's The Dark Side of Genius: The Life of Alfred Hitchcock (1999).<br /><br />Spoto made some extraordinary and fascinating claims about Hitchcock's psychology, presenting his subject as a mixed bag of paranoias, obsessions and pathological urges, among them fantasies of rape, misogyny, a mother fixation and a good many others. But in recent times, we've seen another psychological disorder put forward as a possible explanation some of the neuroses and emotional quirks that Hitchcock seemed possessed by - could Hitchcock have suffered from Asperger Syndrome, a neurobiological pervasive development disorder closely related to autism?<br /><br />Typically characterised by problems with social and communication skills, it seems to be being used by some writers and even Asperger support groups to explain some of Hitchcock's more eccentric on- and off-set behaviour.<br /><br />It should be noted that although Austrian paediatrician Hans Asperger first wrote about the disorder in 1944, it didn't become widely recognised as a condition until the early 90s and Hitchcock died in 1980, so any attempt at a diagnosis can only be made retrospectively and be based on third-hand information gleaned from the many, many books, articles and interviews that have appeared over the years and should be approached with caution and scepticism.<br /><br />Whatever you may think of Spoto's well-informed study of Hitchcock's psyche, there was at least some evidence to back up his claims. Looking at the six main characteristics of Asperger in turn, it's difficult to see exactly any such evidence to support the claim that Hitchcock was indeed a sufferer:<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">1: Difficulty with Reciprocal Social Interactions</span><br />This seems to be the key symptom that has led many observers to this conclusion, though if that is the case, they're making a deeply flawed assumption. In essence, it means that the Asperger sufferer finds any kind of "normal" social interaction difficult and fails to understand the "give-and-take" of conversation.<br /><br />Now while it's true that Hitchcock played sometimes cruel practical jokes on his cast and crew, seemingly oblivious the ramifications of his actions, to suggest that one of the most eloquent and erudite of film directors should have communications difficulties is extraordinary. Indeed, he was known to have worked very closely with his scriptwriters on the initial crafting of his scripts, hardly the behaviour of a man who failed to understand the mechanics of conversation.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">2. Impairments in Language Skills</span><br />Have you ever seen Hitchcock being interviewed? Or any of those marvellous introductions to Alfred Hitchcock Presents? Again, hardly the work of a man who found using language to express thoughts, feelings, and emotions difficult. Quite the opposite in fact - Hitchcock's witty and often mordant on-screen introductions were often the highlight of the episode and he frequently recorded more than one of them. Special versions were shot for the UK removing some of Hitch's barbed comments about the show's sponsors and during the third season, he even filmed intros in French and German, languages he was fluent in.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">3. Narrow Range of Interests and Insistence on Set Routines</span><br />Now this one could easily be twisted to suit any truly creative film director - it suggests Hitchcock had a limited range of thematic interests which simply couldn't be further from the truth. Take one of his films from each of six decades in which he worked and no two of them will be alike. Sure, there were themes that he returned to from time to time [particularly the wronged-man-on-the-run] but to suggest that Hitchcock had a narrow range of interests is absurd.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">4. Motor Clumsiness</span><br />I can find no evidence to support of discredit the notion that Hitchcock suffered any problems with motor skills - other than those one might expect from a man of his build - and would very much like to hear any evidence for or against.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">5. Cognitive Issues</span><br />One of the fundamental symptoms of Asperger in something referred to as "mindblindness", the inability to make inferences about what another person is thinking, a lack of empathy. Hitchcock's delight in playing cruel jokes on cast, crew, family and friends may suggest to some that he lacked the ability to understand what the consequences of his actions would be on those people, but it's probably more accurate to say that Hitchcock just had a bizarre and bleak sense of humour [one wonders if any of the people claiming that Hitch suffered from Asperger actually watched any of his films].<br /><br />Mindblindness can also give rise to deficiencies in problem solving, mental planning and the ability to stay focused on a task - hardly qualities one would expect to find in the most influential and widely imitated film director of all time.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">6. Sensory Sensitivities</span><br />Many children who suffer from Asperger develop issues with their senses, often perceiving what the rest of us would experience as a fairly mild or barely noticeable sensory event as very intense. This might seem a good thing for someone working in the visual arts it would almost certainly cripple any artistic endeavour in actuality.<br /><br />I've yet to find any actual written evidence anywhere to back up the increasing number of claims that Hitchcock was an Asperger sufferer - his name has simply started to appear on lists of famous AS sufferers, compiled by people who clearly never met him and were therefore unable to make an accurate diagnosis. Chances are that in our increasingly syndrome-obsessed world we're just looking for smaller and smaller pigeonholes into which to fit people and poor Hitch has now been stuck with the AS label.<br /><br />There's no doubt that he was a fascinating character with a deeply complex psyche and more than his share of psychological baggage. But maybe we just need to accept that he was like all truly great creative people [not just those who merely make films, play music, write books - those who are genuinely deserving of the label creative genius] and was deeply eccentric and emotionally flawed - which is exactly what needed to be to create the work that he did.<br /><br />When you watch the new DVD releases of Alfred Hitchcock Presents [and you really should - they're even better than you'll remember them] watch those witty, caustic intros with a keener eye. There's definitely something going on behind that portly, avuncular exterior - something dark and difficult, but Asperger's? The jury's still out…Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-7254320132020715842007-02-02T23:33:00.000-08:002007-02-04T23:36:52.594-08:00"Just one more thing..."Sometimes, the work of the fictional detective seems to have more in common with some arcane mystical practice than the rigorously methodical, logic-based process of deduction it is in real life. Real world cops rely on years of experience, methodical procedures and cutting edge technology to get their man, while their fictional counterparts seem blessed with near paranormal abilities that allow them to deduct the truth from facts and clues often overlooked by we mere mortals. Foremost among these uncanny flatfoots is of course the Prince of Detectives himself, Sherlock Holmes, whose ability to deduce the facts from limited clues often seems like the work of black magic.<br /><br />On American TV, things were generally a lot easier - cops raced around town, roughing up suspects, hanging out with informants and looking good in nifty fashions, pursuing more-or-less routine avenues of detection but doing it a bit more glamorously than you'd find in your average real-life inner-city precinct. In the 1970s, the one exception to the rule was <span style="font-weight: bold;">Columbo</span>.<br /><br />Although best known and loved now as the shabbily-dressed character portrayed by Peter Falk in the long-running series of television films, the character had been created by Richard Levinson and William Link for an episode of anthology series <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Chevy Mystery Show</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Enough Rope</span> [1960] where he was played by Bert Freed. The character turned up again in a stage version of the same story, this time played by Thomas Mitchell and in 1968, Falk took over the role and made it his own in the pilot film <span style="font-weight: bold;">Prescription: Murder</span>, which soon led to a series within the <span style="font-weight: bold;">NBC Mystery Movie</span> umbrella, starting in 1971.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Columbo </span>was the most unusual American TV detective show in that it was never a whodunit. The audience always knew right from the opening scenes who the killer and the victim were and what the motive behind the killing was. The earliest use of this technique, known as the "inverted mystery" is widely credited to English writer R. Austin Freeman and the creators of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Columbo</span> readily acknowledge the debt to Freeman's work.<br /><br />With the sense of mystery removed [we already knew from the start who did it], what makes Columbo so compelling is the ensuing battle of psychological wits between Columbo and the killer. The shabbily dressed Lieutenant Columbo [his first name was never revealed on screen, despite what a famous question in Trivial Pursuit might have us believe - <a href="http://www.columbo-site.freeuk.com/firstnamecourt.htm">see here for more details</a>] never used a gun, and his car certainly wasn't a souped-up penis extension with go-faster stripes, just a rather battered 1960 Peugeot 403, a means of getting him to and from work - and there was never any guarantee that it would manage that. Instead he relied solely on the one thing that so many TV 'tecs seem to lack - his wits.<br /><br />When he first arrives at the murder scene - often 10 to 15 minutes into the mystery - Columbo would often seem disinterested in the crime scene, seeming befuddled, a bit lost and in danger of overlooking the clues that his more "ordinary" colleagues were carefully combing the scene for. But somewhere, the killer has made a subtle but fatal flaw and it's this weakness that Columbo eventually manages to exploit having managed to deduce the vital clue within minutes of his flustered first appearance.<br /><br />The secret weapon in Columbo's arsenal seems to be his uncanny ability to read human body language, to be able to tell at a glance when someone is lying. It's actually surprisingly easy to spot when someone is lying to you as the person involved exhibits all sorts of behaviour that gives the game away, but it's something that few of us actually notice. Though Columbo certainly does. He can see when the stiff and limited physical expressions, the avoidance of eye contact, the touching of the person's own their face, throat and mouth while trying to maintain the lie. He can see how facial expressions in liars are limited largely to their mouths instead of using the whole face, can read their defensive and discomfort at being questioned and will spot the way that guilty people invariably place an object [a book, a cup, anything at hand] between themselves and their interrogator as a way for keeping them from the truth.<br /><br />But what the show's writers all seemed to understand and used so well is the fact that you can catch out a liar very easily by suddenly changing the subject of a conversation, then switching back to the topic at hand with equal rapidity - a liar will gladly change the subject and become more relaxed, but the change back to the subject of the lie will often confuse them enough to tie themselves in knots and allow the lie to be revealed. Week in, week out we saw Columbo exploiting this simple behavioural tic, especially in "Just one more thing..." questions, and using it to tease the truth from his suspect.<br /><br />In more recent years, as the condition has become better known, some commentators have suggested that Columbo's success as a detective might be down to him suffering from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder [OCD], an affliction that dogs a later small screen detective in a similar vein, Monk. Certainly the man in the mac has a near obsessive near to tie up the loose ends of every case he investigates, but OCD is just a currently rather trendy label to pin on people whose behaviour is seen as a fixated and slightly paranoid. Chances are that Columbo was just a bloody good cop whose abilities make him seem odd and slightly sinister but who really just refuses to give up on a case.<br /><br />In fact, if Columbo is afflicted with a psychological condition it would seem to be a very slight case of sadism. Witness his masterly playing of mind games with the man or woman he suspects of having committed the crime, especially in his final mental torturing of them, allowing them to believe that they might just be getting away with this before springing one of 70s TV's most famous catch-phrases: "Just one more thing…" Columbo seemed to actively enjoy this mental sparring, allowing the killer enough hope of getting away with it that it will lull him into a false sense of security and trip them up.<br /><br />These climactic scenes were always the most enjoyable parts of the show, the final pay-off as Columbo solves the last piece of the puzzle and springs his trap. There was never any real doubt that he would actually solve the case [though in one episode from Season Five, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Forgotten Lady</span> [14 September 1975], he agrees to allow the killer [played by Janet Leigh] to "get away with it" as she's clearly seriously mentally unwell and dying] but watching the killer initially believing that they were cleverer than Columbo [there's a real class conflict subtext at work in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Columbo</span>, with the working class gumshoe invariably taking on mainly middle-class adversaries] before panicking, making mistakes and finally marveling like the rest of us at the tenacity of the scruffy little man's perspicacity and relentlessness.<br />KEVIN LYONS<br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Columbo Season 5 is released on UK DVD by Universal on 12 February 2007, priced £29.99.</span>Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1165876183018898892006-12-11T14:04:00.000-08:002006-12-11T14:29:43.030-08:00The shape of things to come...I've been promising this for some time, but here's the first look at some of what the new version of EOFFTV, now due to launch at the end of January 2007, will look like. There's still much to do, not only with transferring the data but also setting up the graphics - note that the graphics in the images below are provisional and will be a bit nattier by the time the new site launches. The new look is cleaner and tidier than the existing site, retaining some of the iconic images that have been with us for the last three years, but removing a lot of the clutter that has accumulated over the years.<br /><br /><br />In this first shot, we see what the basic pages will look like - not every entry will have the bar at the right hand side of the screen, but many of them will, with posters, links you can use to buy DVDs, additional information and all sorts of other goodies.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/239/27/1600/755365/newsite1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/239/27/400/196005/newsite1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />In this shot, we can see the effects of the first of the many new gadgets that the new EOFFTV will have - the ability to remove both the left and right bars, making it a lot easier to get a clean printout:<br /><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/239/27/1600/463888/newsite2.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/239/27/400/582108/newsite2.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />And finally for now, a look at what one of the review pages will look like. For many of these reviews, I'll have a series of screen captures in the right bar giving you some idea of what the film or TV show under review actually looks like:<br /><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/239/27/1600/908817/newsite3.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/239/27/400/850233/newsite3.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />Hopefully all this meets with your approval - it's only a taste of what's to come and there are still many improvements to be made as well as fine tuning some of those already in place, including improving the search facility and refining the new updates system which I'll be showing off over Christmas.<br /><br />I'd love to hear your thoughts on any of this, so please feel free to leave feedback below.<br /><span style=";font-family:&quot;;font-size:10;" ></span>Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1164146786827118122006-11-21T14:01:00.000-08:002006-11-21T14:06:26.840-08:00Laudanum, Madness and the End of the World As We Know ItAnyone with an interest in archive television and who is within reach of the National Film Theatre on London's South Bank throughout December are in for a treat as the BFI are dragging lots of long unseen gems from the archive.<br /><br />There are two TV related events on in December, the first being the now annual Missing Believed Wiped event, a celebration of British TV shows that were once thought to have been destroyed and lost forever but which have thankfully turned up again. This year, the event is split into two screenings, both taking place on Saturday 2 December. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Comedy Plus</span>, which kicks off at 18:30, will feature a second chance to see the rare <span style="font-weight: bold;">Out of the Trees</span> episode pilot by Douglas Adams and Graham Chapman, an admag [one of those often unintentionally bizarre collections of TV ads that used to keep British TV viewers perplexed back in the day] and a 1961 episode of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Executioner</span>, a drama about the French Resistance starring the unlikely pairing of Patrick McGoohan and comedian Charlie Drake...<br /><br />Earlier that same day, the NFT are presenting a screening that no self-respecting fan of British telefantasy will want to miss. Kicking off at 15:50 the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Nuclear Threat</span> screening consists of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Out of the Unknown</span> episode <span style="font-weight: bold;">Level Seven </span>[1966] directed by British TV legend Rudolph Cartier and, even more excitingly, a rare chance to see the Nigel Kneale drama <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Crunch</span> in which London is held to ransom by nuclear terrorists.<br /><br />Also of interest will be the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Tales of Laudanum and Madness</span> strand, "A selection of television drama based on outstanding tales of murderous conspiracy infused with the tincture of opium by writers Edgar Allan Poe, Wilkie Collins and Sheridan Le Fanu." The many temptations on offer in this series include:<br /><br />Friday 1 December [at 20:40] and Thursday 7 December [at 18:30]<br />20:40: Sheridan Le Fanu & HG Wells: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mystery and Imagination: Uncle Silas </span>[1968] / <span style="font-weight: bold;">Spine Chillers: The Red Room </span>[1980]<br /><br />Wednesday 6 December at 20:10<br />Special TV Preview: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ruby in the Smoke </span>[2006] - Billie Piper stars in this adaptation of the Phillip Pullman novel with the author in attendance for a Q&A<br /><br />Saturday 16 December [at 18:00] and Wednesday 20 December [at 20:30]<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Woman in White </span>- the 1997 BBC version of Wilkie Collin's novel starring Tara Fitzgerald, Simon Callow and Ian Richardson.<br /><br />Monday 18 December [at 20:40]<br />Edgar Allan Poe: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Fall of the House of Usher</span>, from <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mystery and Imagination </span>in 1966, starring Susannah York and Denholm Elliot; also a 1975 BBC version of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Imp of the Perverse</span> with former <span style="font-weight: bold;">Doctor Who </span>companion Lalla Ward; and a 1991 Channel 4 adaptation of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Tell-Tale Heart </span>starring Steven Berkoff.<br /><br />Tuesday 19 December [at 18:40]<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Dark Angel </span>- another version of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Uncle Silas</span>, made by the BBC in 1989, starring Beattie Edney and Peter O'Toole and directed by Peter Hammond.<br /><br />Wednesday 20 December [at 18:10] and Saturday 30 December [at 15:40]<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Wyvern Mystery</span> - the BBC's excellent adaptation of the Le Fanu story starring Naomi Watts.<br /><br />Thursday 21 December [at 18:20] and 29 December [at 20:30]<br />Wilkie Collins: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Woman In White </span>- another version of the Wilkie Collins classic, dating 1957 [it was shown as part of Thames Television's Hour of Mystery and stars Sarah Lawson, Ewan Solon and Eric Pohlman. Also: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Moonstone</span> - the penultimate and only surviving episode of the 1959 series; and <span style="font-weight: bold;">A Terribly Strange Bed </span>from the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Orson Welles' Great Mysteries </span>series of 1974.<br /><br />For more details and booking details for any of these must-see screenings, visit the <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.bfi.org.uk/incinemas/nft/">NFT's website</a>.Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1161712666316074932006-10-24T10:51:00.000-07:002006-10-24T10:57:46.366-07:00The "Defective Detective"<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/239/27/1600/monk.0.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/239/27/320/monk.0.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Sometimes it seems - particularly in the States - as though every possible twist and variation on the tried and trusted cop show has been done. But occasionally, something comes along that's so out of the blue, so unexpected that it make you site up, take notice and hold out hope that maybe, just maybe, there are a few new ideas left.<br /><br />One such show in the excellent <span style="font-weight: bold;">Monk </span>which offers us something we've never see in a cop show before - a hero who suffers from obsessive compulsive disorder. Adrian Monk is a former cop traumatised by the death of his wife in a car bomb attack who spent three years locked in his house refusing to leave before finally being coaxed out by his nurse Sharona who continues to help him now that he's doing consultancy work for the police. Afflicted from an early age with obsessive-compulsive disorder which now gives him a compulsive attention to detail, allowing him to spot clues and patterns that the cops may have missed.<br /><br />At first it might look like that the OCD angle is just a gimmick, a cheap attempt to ring the changes in a show which would otherwise have been a fairly ordinary, if well made and acted, police procedural. But although there were a few dissenting voices, there was plenty of praise for the show from medical community, mainly because, although the depiction of OCD isn't completely accurate, it was the first popular show to highlight the condition and give audiences an insight into what can be a very strange and distressing disorder.<br /><br />OCD affects very few people - only between 1 and 3.3% - but the effects on its sufferers can be devastating. While studying for a psychology degree many years ago, my class was shown a video of a young woman affected by OCD and her attempts to get through an ordinary day while struggling with her many tics and obsessions. Watching the poor woman trying to leave her house while obsessing over things like how ajar all the internal doors were was deeply affecting and remains one of the most enduring images from my three years of study.<br /><br />Monk displays many of the more characteristic oddities of the average OCD sufferer - he obsesses about germs and, in one of the most common traits, is fixated on symmetry, always trying to impose order of a chaotic world. It's rare for a real life sufferer to exhibit quite as many of the symptoms as Monk displays but everything he does is characteristic of the disorder. As such, although <span style="font-weight: bold;">Monk </span>is often played for gentle humour, there is an underlying sense of the very real torment that sufferers can experience.<br /><br />And those sufferers themselves seem to have warmed to the character of Monk and seem more than happy that their ailment has been given some long overdue exposure, helping to bust some of the myths surrounding it. As Monk began its third season in 2004, Patricia Perkins, executive director of the Obsessive-Compulsive Foundation and an OCD sufferer herself, surveyed the many emails she had been receiving regarding the show and found that the majority of OCD sufferers were in favour of the show and what it was trying to do.<br /><br />The beauty of the show is that, although you'll laugh at some of Monk's more eccentric behaviour, it never invites you to laugh at Monk himself. It helps to remove some of the stigma and fear of the illness that can result when the non-afflicted first encounter an OCD sufferer [it can be very distressing in the most severe cases]. It helps that Monk is played with sensitivity by the brilliant Tony Shalhoub, whose performance is outstanding and has helped to raise the public profile of OCD, particularly in the States - so much so that Shalhoub has claimed, with some justification, that his character is now the "poster boy" for OCD sufferers.<br /><br />If, like me, you came late to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Monk</span>, you're got a real treat in store as you try to catch up - and you really should. Its a genuinely offbeat show that mixes comedy with sleuthing better than anything else we've seen in recent years. If you haven't succumbed to the eccentric charms of TV's most unusual detective, pop over to the <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/monk_competition.htm">competition page</a> where you could win one of five boxsets of season four up for grabs - I promise you won't regret it!Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1161539034797312912006-10-22T10:36:00.000-07:002006-10-22T10:43:54.880-07:00What a Performance!Every so often, British television does something that completely surprises you. It doesn't happen often, but when it does it's so exciting that you just want to share it with someone. And the current goings-on on the Performance Channel are one such event.<br /><br />I have no idea what the US version of Performance is like but I suspect it's pretty much the same as it is here in the UK. Until recently, it was the home of more highbrow entertainment - classical music concerts, ballet, opera, jazz, you know the sort of thing. But recently, something completely unexpected has been happening at nights on Performance. Some time last year, the British Performance Channel was bought by cable TV giants Eicom and there was some talk of them starting a new channel, Performance Horror, which would act as a rival to the existing specialist channel Zone Horror, formerly The Horror Channel. That has yet to materialise, but at some point they seem to have bought the entire catalogues of Crown International - distributors of cult crap throughout the 70s and 80s - and Eros, the old British low-budget distributor from the 50s and 60s.<br /><br />With Performance Horror still not happening, the cream of this bizarre back catalogue is now showing on Performance Channel after 23:00 each evening - after a day of Oscar Petterson, Strauss in Vienna or Bizet's Carmen British cable and satellite TV viewers can now settle down for a triple bill every night of fabulous low-budget trash, usually comprising a double bill of American films [at least one of which is a Crown International release] and finally, in the very early hours, a creaky old British movies from the glory days of the quota quickies.<br /><br />One of the many little pleasures of the Performance Channel screenings is to be fount in the eccentricity of their presentation. Advertised films don't turn up and are replaced by something similar [so you never know what you've got when you check your recordings the next morning] and when they do show up they're occasionally shown in very strange ways - last night, for example, we had the dreadful comedy <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Beach Girls</span> [1982] - directed by Bud Townsend of porno version of <a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.eofftv.com/a/ali/alice_in_wonderland_1976_main.htm">Alice in Wonderland</a> [1976] infamy. After one ad break [and more on those in a moment] the film returned to where it was a few minutes before the break began, then ground to a halt with a caption reading "End of Part 1". After a few seconds of blank screen, up came "Part 2" and off we went...<br /><br />The ad breaks on Performance are bizarre - they seem to include them just because they have to and often they have no ads to show at all. Instead we get a 30 second piece montage of back stage clips from The Old Vic and then we're back into the film. Elsewhere, there's a 10 second flash for Kenco Coffee that gets shown on its own [yes, you read right, 10 second ad breaks...] or the same ad for conservatories of language courses. It's all very, very strange...<br /><br />But who am I to criticise when they're showing such strange and rare films? Already we've had <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trip With the Teacher</span> [1974], a very rare <span style="font-weight: bold;">Last House on the Left</span> knock-off with Zalman King as the leader of a gang of rapacious bikers; William Grefé's <span style="font-weight: bold;">Stanley</span>, about a native American using snakes to kill those who cross him; Dorothy Stratten in <span style="font-weight: bold;">Galaxina</span>, Mae West's fabulously awful <span style="font-weight: bold;">Sextette</span> and much more besides.<br /><br />For those of you who can get The Performance Channel and haven't yet heard about this treasure trove of lost junk, don't despair - most of the films already shown are being repeated throughout November. These screenings don't seem to have been at all well advertised so to do our bit EOFFTV will keep you up to date with what's due to be shown each month - though bear in mind that the schedule change without warning so don't blame me if something you really wanted to see doesn't actually turn up!<br /><br />OK, here's what's showing for the rest of October - November's schedules to follow next week:<br /><br />SUNDAY 22 OCTOBER<br />23:00 - 0045: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Patriot</span> [1986] - ex-Navy SEAL helps to track down terrorists who have made off with a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />MONDAY 23 OCTOBER<br />00:45 - 02:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Blue Money</span> [1972] - a porn film director makes the mistake of getting involved in affair with one of his stars.<br />02:30 - 03:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Home To Danger</span> [1951] - a drug dealer tries to kill his partner's daughter; directed by Terence Fisher.<br />23:00 - 00:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Resurrection of Zachary Wheeler</span> [1971] - Leslie Nielson stars as a reporter who stumbles upon some nasty medical experiments.<br /><br />TUESDAY 24 OCTOBER<br />00:45 - 02:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Malibu Beach</span> [1978] - teen comedy starring no-one you've ever heard of.<br />02:30 - 04:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kill Me Tomorrow</span> [1957] - another Terence Fisher thriller, co-directed by Francis Searle.<br />23:00 - 00:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Single Room Furnished</span> [1968] - Jayne Mansfield's last film.<br /><br />WEDNESDAY 25 OCTOBER<br />00:45 - 02:15: <span style="font-weight: bold;">My Chauffeur</span> [1986] - mid-80s teen comedy. Says it all surely...<br />02:15 - 03:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Keep it Clean</span> [1956] - British comedy about a man who develops a revolutionary new cleaning machine.<br />23:00 - 00:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Glen and Randa</span> [1971] - bonkers post-apocalyptic science fiction film that should have been a lot better than it was...<br /><br />THURSDAY 26 OCTOBER<br />00:45 - 02:15: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Pom Pom Girls</span> [1976] - Robert Carradine heads the cast in another teen comedy. Also stars 70s cult icon Rainbeaux Smith.<br />02:15 - 03:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Life in Emergency Ward 10</span> [1959] - big screen spin-off from the popular British TV series, directed by Robert Day [<span style="font-weight: bold;">Grip of the Strangler</span> [1958], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Corridors of Blood </span>[1958], <span style="font-weight: bold;">First Man Into Space </span>[1959] et al].<br />23:00 - 00:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Hellcats </span>[1967] - female biker gangs on the rampage.<br /><br />FRIDAY 27 OCTOBER<br />00:30 - 02:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Revenge of the Cheerleaders</span> [1976] - Rainbeaux Smith again in a film that pretty much does exactly what the title says.<br />02:00 - 03:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Murder at 3am</span> [1953] - British crime thriller directed by Francis Searle, starring Dennis Price.<br />23:00 - 00:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Wild Riders</span> [1971] - a pair of thugs rape two women and take over their home.<br /><br />SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER<br />00:45 - 02:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Weekend Pass</span> [1984] - dreadful attempt to remake <span style="font-weight: bold;">On the Town </span>[1949] without the songs and without the jokes.<br />02:30 - 04:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Live It Up </span>[1963] - Lance Comfort directed David Hemmings in a rock-and roll musical.<br />23:00 - 01:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Hunk </span>[1987] - don't waste time or tape on this terrible comedy about computers, the devil and the creation of "the perfect man". Bloody awful in every respect.<br /><br />SUNDAY 29 OCTOBER<br />01:00 - 02:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Virgin Queen of St Francis High</span> [1987] - a high school jock tries to score with a virginal beauty queen.<br />02:30 - 04:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Master of Bankdam</span> [1947] - brothers fight for control of the family business in this period piece directed by Walter Forde and edited by Terence Fisher.<br />23:00 - 00:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Click: The Calendar Girl Killer</span> [1990] - a serial killer stalks fashion models; directed by Ross Hagen who also turns up as the star of many of these films.<br /><br />MONDAY 30 OCTOBER<br />00:30 - 02:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Not Tonight, Darling</span> [1971] - hopeless early 70s British sex comedy - without any sex or comedy...<br />02:00 - 03:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">29 Acacia Avenue</span> [1945] - British comedy starring Jimmy Hanley, Megs Jenkins and Dinah Sheridan.<br />20:00 - 21:40: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Tread Softly Stranger</span> [1958] - crime thriller starring Diana Dors.<br />23:00 - 00:45: <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Demon</span> [1979] - the great Cameron Mitchell went to South Africa for this horror movie.<br /><br />TUESDAY 31 OCTOBER<br />00:45 - 02:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Games That Lovers Play</span> [1970] - Joanna Lumley stars in a terrible British sex comedy.<br />02:30 - 04:00: <span style="font-weight: bold;">And The Same To You</span> [1960] - boxing related British comedy starring the king of the farces, Brian Rix; first Doctor Who William Hartnell; Carry On legend Sid James; and TV comedy magician Tommy Cooper.<br />23:00 - 00:30: <span style="font-weight: bold;">Blood Mania</span> [1970] - obscure American horror film.Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1160748272333971692006-10-13T07:00:00.000-07:002006-10-13T07:04:32.343-07:00REVIEW: New Police Story [2004]<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/239/27/1600/new_police_story.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/239/27/320/new_police_story.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>After frittering away his considerable talents in far too many Hollywood productions that really didn't do his considerable talents justice [<span style="font-weight: bold;">The Tuxedo </span>[2001], the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Shanghai Noon </span>and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Rush Hour </span>films, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Around the World in 80 Days </span>[2004]], Jackie Chan returned home to Hong Kong for his first proper leading role there in years with <span style="font-weight: bold;">San ging chaat goo si</span>, now making it to the UK as <span style="font-weight: bold;">New Police Story</span>. The result isn't quite on a par with those classic action movies that Chan made back in the 80s, but it's head and shoulders above the rest of his recent work and is more fun than just about anything else we've seen in a cinema this year.<br /><br />Chan is fabulous as ever - who'd believe that he was 50 years old when he made this? He looks great and has lost none of the daring athleticism that has earned him the adoration of millions around the world. When we first see him, it's a pretty atypical appearance - drunk as a skunk and vomiting copiously in a back alley. He's playing that most tiresome of movie clichés, the washed up cop, driven to the bottle by the massacre of his special unit by a band of rich pretty-boy spoilt kids who wile away their meaningless days staging elaborate bank robberies and tormenting the police.<br /><br />Chan - that's the character's name as well - is called back to duty when the gang reappears and the stage is set for a series of outlandish stunts and scraps as he teams up with a young partner [played by pop-star / actor / idol Nicholas Tse] who may not be quite what he seems.<br /><br />The first thing you notice in <span style="font-weight: bold;">New Police Story</span> is that it's not a comedy - Chan has been typecast in the west as the slapstick martial artist, Hollywood producers failing to understand that, although he made more than his share of knockabout comedy in Hong Kong, he's also a very accomplished straight actor. Here he gets the chance to play it straight and he does a fantastic job.<br /><br />The plot is almost defiantly old school and all the better for it - it doesn't try to be clever, hip or ground-breaking. It just sets out to deliver the goods and it certainly manages to do that - the action is thick and fast, the stunts awesome [I was convinced that the Jackie-running-from-unfeasibly-large-explosion shot had to be a CGI effect until seeing the obligatory outtakes during the end credits] and the cast pretty, athletic and great fun to watch. And the whole package is beautifully shot by Anthony Pun and directed with commendably few flashy or showy moments by Benny Chan.<br /><br />Those who only know Chan as the high-kicking sidekick from his Western films may find this incarnation of his screen persona a bit odd - he's acting his age, playing it straight straight and clearly tipping his hat to those who have been following his career since before his hit-and-miss Hollywood adventure [there's a lovely bit of business involving a runaway bus that explicitly references the original <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ging chaat goo si</span> / <span style="font-weight: bold;">Police Story </span>[1985], to which this new film has no connection incidentally].<br /><br />Just when you thought Jackie Chan had run out steam and was ready to start collecting his pension, he's back, he's just as great as he ever was and if he keeps on making films like this from time to time I'm sure I won't the only one prepared to turn a blind eye those mostly awful Hollywood disasters.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">New Police Story </span>opens in the UK today, Friday 13 October, and we've got copies of the poster [one signed by Jackie himself!] up for grabs on the <a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/new_police_story_competition.htm">competitions page</a>. And don't forget to read our <a href="http://www.eofftv.com/interviews/j/jackie_chan_interview.htm">interview with Jackie here.</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.newpolicestorymovie.co.uk/game">And - finally! - check out the Jackie Chan / New Police Story game at the official site.</a>Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1160380121050292522006-10-09T00:43:00.000-07:002006-10-09T02:29:24.680-07:00Holding a Grudge<p>All the recent <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge</span> / <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on</span> related activity here at EOFFTV inevitably got me thinking about the extraordinary history of this much-loved Japanese horror series and its creator, Takashi Shimizu. Although it was Hideo Nakata who re-introduced J-horror to the west with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ringu</span> [1998], it has been Shimizu who has been the genre's most committed practitioner, with no less than 14 film or TV horrors to his name since his career began in 1998 - and with at least two more to come.</p>Although he's occasionally worked outside the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge</span> series - with films like <span style="font-weight: bold;">Tomie: Re-Birth</span> [2001], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Marebito</span> [2004] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Rinne</span> / <span style="font-weight: bold;">Reincarnation </span>[2005] - it is the six feature films and two segments of a TV film relating the ongoing story of a powerful curse for which he is best known. Much has been written in the past about the obsessiveness with which Italian director Dario Argento has explored various tropes and iconography that crops up over and over again in his films, but even his compulsive need to rework the same themes pales into insignificance beside Shimizu's extraordinary dedication to a single theme.<br /><p>The <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge</span> story began in 1998 shortly after Shimizu created a three minute short for his end-of-semester film while studying at film school in Tokyo. The film so impressed his tutor, J-horror legend Kiyoshi Kurosawa [of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Cure</span> [1997] and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kairo</span> [2001] fame], that he introduced Shimizu to producer Yasuyuki Uemura, who was preparing a TV horror anthology film, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gakkô no kaidan G</span> [1998] for Kansai-TV. Uemura was also taken by the way that Shimizu was able to create a palpable sense of terror in so short a running time and signed him up for not one but two of the film's segments, <span style="font-weight: bold;">4444444444</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Katasumi</span> [the other directors were Kurosawa and Tetsu Maeda.</p>Shimizu subsequently claimed [in an interview with the <a href="http://www.japattack.com/main/?q=node/72">Japattack website</a> that the two short segments "are actually the foundations of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Juon</span>. They lay out the basic premise of the curse and it is almost like the true prequel of the story." <span style="font-weight: bold;">4444444444 </span>features a young man coming across an abandoned mobile phone which begins to ring. When he answers it, he hears cats, foreshadowing the eerie use of cats and their cries in the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge </span>feature films, and it ends with the genuinely scary first appearance of ghost boy Toshio [unnamed here but its definitely him]. Meanwhile <span style="font-weight: bold;">Katasumi </span>/ <span style="font-weight: bold;">In a Corner </span>features a pair of schoolgirls being attacked by the ghostly woman we later come to know and fear as Toshio's mother.<br /><br />Shimizu developed the two characters for his first run through of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge </span>story, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>[2000], again made for Kansai TV. Seen today, in the wake of the two remakes [the Japanese version in 2002 and the American re-run in 2004], this first iteration of the story seems a little crude, with its cut-price special effects and limited resources, but it still packs a powerful punch. It's much slower than the remakes [which should strike terror in the hearts of those who complain that the remakes are already too slow] but has some of the most memorably scary moments in the entire series. Shimizu's real talent is in creating a steadily accumulating air of dread and unease and that's more than evident here - it make take its own good time in telling its story, but that mounting horror is genuinely unsettling.<br /><br />The first TV version of the story also features that odd story structure that Shimizu has favoured for the series ever since. Perhaps inspired by the anthology format of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gakkô no kaidan G</span>, the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>films feature a series of loosely related and inter-locking vignettes which combine to tell a single overall episode in the ongoing tale of the Grudge.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>was a huge success and Shimizu returned to the same world with the disappointing <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on 2</span> [2000] which is made up of an extraordinary amount of material from the first film, as much as 30 minutes of its meagre 76 minute running time. After a pointless recap of events from the first film [which is where the 30 minute "flashback" comes in] Shimizu finishes off the storylines from the first film but this time it's a rather prosaic and tedious affair, leading some commentators to suggest that this is actually just material that was cut from the first film and lazily cobbled together to create a hasty cash-in.<br /><br />Nevertheless, the video release of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on 2 </span>was another hit and Shimizu decided to bring the story to a wider audience with a feature film version. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>[2003], aka <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on: The Grudge </span>retold the story of Toshio and his vengeful mother and the chaos they create in and around their haunted house. Again, the story is told in a series of inter-locking short stories, chronicling the various residents and visitors to the house.<br /><br />The film version is obviously slicker than its predecessors and moves at a more comfortable [for Western audiences] pace but it lacks some of the sheer terror that the original, cruder version of the story generated. There are some astonishing moments - say what you like about the apparent silliness of it, but that moment when Hitomi dives under her duvet only to find something nasty waiting for her is still brilliantly scary, and there are some fabulous, almost subliminal glimpses of Toshio stalking Kayako during her time working at the hospital. But the film lacks the steady accumulation of dread that the TV movie had, and the performances are not as effective or as believable this time round. That said, it's still a genuinely creepy film that proved to be the "next big thing" from Japan when it reached Western audiences.<br /><br />By the time non-Japanese audiences got their first taste of the Grudge, the series had already comprised the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Gakkô no kaidan G </span>segments and two feature length TV / video releases and even before the film version of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>had run its course there were nagging questions over whether or not Shimizu had anything left to say on the subject. Just how long could he keep on telling the same story without boring his audiences to death? And was he really a one trick pony, capable only of working in the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>milieu? The poor critical and public reception of <span style="font-weight: bold;">Tomie: Re-Birth </span>[2001], made between the first two <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on</span>s and the first theatrical version suggested that perhaps he hadn't got it in him to make anything but endless variations of the same story.<br /><br />These nagging doubts were partly put to rest with the release of the second theatrical film, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on: The Grudge 2 </span>[2003] which, although it did little to assuage fears that Shimizu was incapable of making anything but <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge </span>movies, did at least suggest that there was still plenty of life left in the series. A quantum leap ahead of the first theatrical film, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on 2 </span>boasts better performances, a more cohesive overall storyline [though it still adopts that curious, time-skipping structure familiar from earlier films] and more scares than the first theatrical film.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on: The Grudge 2 </span>remains the pinnacle [thus far] of Shimizu's obsessive interrogation of the same story, packing in some incredibly subtle shocks and more inventive twists and turns than all the rest of the films put together. The possessed wig may be a bit silly - albeit with a great pay-off - but look out for Toshio's ghostly handprints on a car windscreen and the disturbing revelations about Kyoko's pregnancy among other impressive new wrinkles to the story.<br /><br />The film boasts the single best vignette in the entire series, the beautifully constructed and frankly completely brilliant story of Tomoko who is haunted by strange banging sounds coming through the walls of her apartment every night at 12:27 am. This is Shimizu at his very best, an eerie mystery that develops beautifully to a fabulous resolution that is as shocking as it is unexpected. This one story alone is worth the price of a DVD purchase.<br /><br />Scarier, more emotionally engaging and more ambitious than the first theatrical release, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on 2 </span>should have been the zenith of the series and indeed Shimizu looked set to move on to pastures new, having finally worked the Grudge out of his system. In 2004, he made the flawed but fascinating dark fantasy <span style="font-weight: bold;">Marebito </span>and contributed a segment, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kinpatsu kaidan</span>, to another TV anthology film, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Suiyô puremia: sekai saikyô J horâ SP Nihon no kowai yoru</span> [2004], both of which saw him venturing beyond the confines of the Grudge milieu.<br /><br />But by this time, Hollywood had caught on to the growing worldwide success of Japanese horror and the success of the less-than-impressive <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ringu </span>remake, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Ring</span>, in 2002 opened the way for a series of Americanised remakes of Asian hits, including <span style="font-weight: bold;">Dark Water </span>[2005] [a remake of Hideo Nakata's <span style="font-weight: bold;">Honogurai mizu no soko kara</span> [2002]], <span style="font-weight: bold;">Pulse </span>[2006] [reworking Kurosawa's <span style="font-weight: bold;">Kairo </span>[2001]] and the forthcoming <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Eye </span>[2007], a remake of EOFFTV's favourite Asian horror film, the Pang Brother's terrifying <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jin gwai </span>[2002]. Inevitably, the popularity of the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on </span>series demanded it's own remake - less inevitably, the Hollywood reworking would be made by Shimizu, the first time that an Asian director had been brought in to redo his own work.<br /><br />As a result, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Grudge </span>[2004] is by default the best of the Hollywood remakes, though to be fair if it had been directed by anyone else it would have been a lot less interesting than it is. It reworks the same ideas that Shimizu has been peddling for the previous six years and is notably less scary thanks to the basic idea being dumbed down for western consumption. But despite that it's a very watchable film, with even Sarah Michelle Gellar turning in a better performance than one might have expected from her in the lead role.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Grudge </span>was a surprise hit and it had the unfortunate effect of dragging Shimizu back into Grudgeworld just as it looked like he was going to start spreading his wings and move on. Once you get involved with Hollywood, the chances of escaping a long-running series start to get slimmer and Shimizu was lured back for his sixth full-length go at the same story in 2006 with the as yet unseen <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Grudge 2</span>. It's picking up some good early notices [the consensus is that it's better than the first Americanised version] but surely now Shimizu is losing any credibility he may have had. Despite the fact that his contribution to the <span style="font-weight: bold;">J-Horror Theatre </span>project, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Rinne </span>/ <span style="font-weight: bold;">Reincarnation </span>[2005] has also been well received, he's finding it hard to escape the curse of <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Grudge </span>and has announced a third Japanese theatrical version, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ju-on: The Grudge 3</span>, due for release next year. Shimizu has declared that this will be the final instalment of the series, but Sony Pictures, creators of the Hollywood versions, may yet throw a spanner in the works - they announced at the 2006 Comic-Con that they were pressing ahead with their own <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge 3</span>. And yes, they've asked Shimizu to direct but he's professed a desire to simply produce this planned version and hands the reins over to someone else. Not that it's stopped him re-visiting the American <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge </span>for an extended Director's Cut which adds some new gore scenes, rejigs the storyline and reinstates some previously discarded footage.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Grudge </span>series is one of the most convoluted in film history, essentially consisting of a pair of mini-prequels followed by three separate but related series of films that all tell the same story - the tale of a curse created by a horrific double murder - from various angles. The curious thing about it is that, although one would love to write it off as a seemingly never-ending cash-cow. every time you thing that Shimizu has run out of steam and done all that there is to do with the series, he comes up with something new and interesting. Whether it will survive another two instalments to the parallel Japanese and American series remains to be seen.<br />KEVIN LYONS<br /><br /><a href="http://www.eofftv.com/competitions/grudge_directors_cut_competition.htm">Win a video camera and copies of the Director's Cut in our <span style="font-weight: bold;">Grudge</span> competition.</a>Kevinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09058994682929578573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31265759.post-1159525197777787592006-09-29T03:14:00.000-07:002006-09-29T03:29:50.283-07:00Tales from Trumptonshire<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/239/27/1600/windy_miller.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/239/27/320/windy_miller.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>The recent release of the Trumptonshire box set on DVD gave me cause to reacquaint myself with one of the great TV institutions of my childhood. Back in the mid-1960s, British kids were given a new series of TV shows to watch - starting with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Camberwick Green</span> in 1966 and progressing to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trumpton</span> in 1967 and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Chigley </span>two years later, the series told the tales of three neighbouring villages in the fictional English county of Trumptonshire. Told with puppets in stop motion animation with narration from Brit kids TV legend Brian Cant [best remembered as the presenter of the long-running and very much loved <span style="font-weight: bold;">Play Away </span>[1971 - 1984]] each episode ran just 15 minutes - and seemed to be about nothing at all!<p>And this is probably what makes the Trumptonshire trilogy unique among kids show from their time [and indeed probably since] - they were just vignettes about everyday life in this fictional town. As such they were almost soap operas for kids, charting the daily lives of fairly ordinary "people", albeit ones with strange loping gaits thanks to the distinctive style of the animation.</p>First out of the gate came <span style="font-weight: bold;">Camberwick Green </span>with its unforgettable opening sequence of a musical box out of which would rise the star of that week's show. Running to just 13 episodes, each week we met a different resident of the tiny village - Peter the postman; Windy Miller, the owner of the local windmill [and his uncanny ability to walk in and out the building without ever being hit by one of the sails!]; Mr Crockett, the ga